1.09.2008

Shasta Dam Politics

The battle over the future of Shasta Dam surfaced this afternoon in the Assembly Governmental Organization committee in the form of joint resolution urging the federal government to reaffirm recognition of an Indian tribe along the McCloud River. 

The Winnemem Wintu tribe, a dozen of whose members attended the hearing in native garb, opposes raising the dam on Lake Shasta which would inundate more of their holy places along the middle fork of the McCloud River, many of which were lost when the dam was completed in 1945. 

They complain that the federal government stopped recognizing them and should reaffirm their status as a recognized tribe, which would give them more power to prevent potential destruction of their village sites and sacred places if the federal government decides to raise the dam. 

“All we’re asking for is an even chance,” Mark Franco, the tribe’s headman, told the committee. “We have never seen the proof (our federal recognition) was terminated.” 

Assembly Joint Resolution 39, basically a dandified letter urging federal officials to re-examine the case of the Winnemem Wintu, is carried by Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael, a former Natural Resources Defense Council lawyer. 

The NRDC, which staunchly opposes raising the height of Shasta Dam has been a long-time champion of the Winnemem Wintu. The tribe declared war on the United States in 2000 when the Bureau of Reclamation first proposed raising the 602-foot tall dam by 6.5 to 18.5 feet. 

Only GOP Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries of Riverside noted that the resolution had broader implications that federal recognition of a small Indian tribe. 

“There are supporters of your effort whose goal is to tear down or stop the continued existence of the Shasta Dam,” Jeffries said. “I don’t like the iea of other people using your tribe as a pawn.”

 Assemblyman Alberto Torrico, the Fremont Democrat who chairs the committee, appeared to be fighting the impulse to say “Very first time that’s ever happened,” but restrained himself and merely described politics as a world of ever-shifting alliances. 

Franco need not answer the question about the dam since it wasn’t germaine to the resolution and its purpose, Torrico said.

 Raising Shasta dam is supported by U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein and the farmers and water interests of the Central Valley. 

Early last year, the Fresno-based Westlands Water District – the largest agricultural user of Northern California water – spent nearly $35 million to purchase 3,000 acres of land on the McCloud River to make it easier to raise the dam. 

Located on the property is the private Bollibokka fishing club, built in 1904 by the founders of Hills Brothers Coffee and 26 Winnemem Wintu villages and burial grounds. 

If federal officials and lawmakers decide to raise the dam, the Westlands acreage would be sold to the federal government and flooded. 

Huffman’s measure was easily approved – even Jeffries voted for it.  It now heads to the Assembly floor.

 

 

 

Filed under: State Agencies



3 Comments »

  1. Nice of you to bring up water. When USC thrashed Notre Dame by 30 in the late-seventies, Ara Parseghian blamed the loss on his team from leaving South Bend in the snow and playing in 80 degree weather in Los Angeles. Legendary sportswriter, Jim Murray, said, “That’s like blaming the Johnstown flood on a leaky toilet in Altoona.” Hey, you brought it up.

    Comment by Gus Turdlock — 1.10.2008 @ 10:27 pm

  2. Even if they raise the dam that doesn’t solve the problem in the big picture.

    Lake Shasta is the largest reservoir in California, able to hold more than 4 1/2 million acre feet of water. But with substandard rainfall hitting the North State the last two years in a row, the water level has dropped to its lowest point in 16 years.

    With the demand for water growing, while the supply is decreasing, it would take much heavier rainfall to get the North State’s water levels back on track. So will the North State’s water levels be able to rise to the occasion? Experts say it is possible, just not probable, especially with the second driest start to January since 2000.

    This area of the country needs to start thinking about alternate ways of bringing in water, maybe the Obama administration will have some new ideas, maybe not.

    Comment by Indian River — 1.26.2009 @ 2:16 pm

  3. I highly doubt it! The only thing the Obama Admin. has done is spend, spend, spend…

    “Even if they raise the dam that doesn’t solve the problem in the big picture.

    Lake Shasta is the largest reservoir in California, able to hold more than 4 1/2 million acre feet of water. But with substandard rainfall hitting the North State the last two years in a row, the water level has dropped to its lowest point in 16 years.

    With the demand for water growing, while the supply is decreasing, it would take much heavier rainfall to get the North State’s water levels back on track. So will the North State’s water levels be able to rise to the occasion? Experts say it is possible, just not probable, especially with the second driest start to January since 2000.

    This area of the country needs to start thinking about alternate ways of bringing in water, maybe the Obama administration will have some new ideas, maybe not.”

    Comment by Buy Oranges — 10.18.2010 @ 8:08 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment