The “Reform” of Proposition 25?


By Loren Kaye

Some day the Legislature will pass a balanced, gimmick-free budget that will carefully weigh the competing priorities of a diverse state and judiciously determine how to address them. 

While we’re waiting, we’ll be left with an on-time budget. 

Proponents of Proposition 25, the 2010 ballot measure that reduced the legislative vote threshold for the state budget to a simple majority, didn’t promise much — but even then they oversold it. 

They claimed that this measure would bring about “responsible budgeting and fiscal responsibility.” And they were right, if by “responsible” you mean billions in phantom revenues (2011 budget) or billions in one-time solutions like loans, spending postponements or fund shifts (2012 budget). 

They promised to punish the Legislature and dock its pay if they didn’t pass an on-time budget. But they never said the budget had to be balanced, or free of gimmicks or even complete. They didn’t say that the Governor even had to sign it in order for them to get paid. 

The State Controller, John Chiang, tried to read all sorts of accountability into Proposition 25, but a judge in effect told him to read the plain words and step aside. Mr. Chiang hasn’t appealed that decision. 

Proponents asserted that Proposition 25 would reform “California’s badly broken state budget process, so taxpayers, schools and services are protected, while legislators are held accountable if they fail to pass the budget on time.” Let’s see, this budget counts on a yet-to-be-approved seven-year, $40 billion tax increase, maintains deep cuts in higher education and the judiciary, and takes credit for – but does not enact – reductions in the state payroll. So much for protecting taxpayers and services – but the budget hit the deadline, so the Legislature passed the “accountability” test.

What’s more, budget negotiations are hardly complete. Left undone are major decisions on welfare costs, tax collections and property tax sharing that were part of the Governor’s original proposal. 

Proposition 25 certainly fixed the “problem” its advocates identified – a chronically tardy state budget. But it did nothing to create a better or smarter budget. Indeed, the new constitutional authority bestowed by the measure actually creates permission for the majority party to postpone important fiscal decisions pending future, hoped-for good news. In short, Proposition 25 gave official sanction to late budgets, in fact if not in name. 


Loren Kaye is president of California Foundation for Commerce and Education, a think tank affiliated with CalChamber. Follow Loren on Twitter at @KayeLoren.



Filed under: Opinionation

1 Comment »

  1. This is corruption of public service and generational theft..pure and simple. This is not just a moral crisis of the first order, this is the moral crisis of our age. We are collectively endangering our children’s economic futures without giving them the slightest say in the matter. We are doing this systematically and with malice aforethought. Worst of all, we are pretending not to notice. Shame on the unions and their crony toadie union politicians that have sacrificed our children’s future by consuming future budgets for the next 30 years. Los Angeles is predicted to be BANKRUPT by 2014, San Francisco by 2016…San Jose is there now…as entire budgets are swept to pay the new $100k – 300k for life for folks retiring in their 50’s and on the take for 20 – 35 years plus free medical (that does a millionaire make and does not represent “middle class”) these unions have created the new elite – the new bourgeois – by clearly gaming and bribing the system to enrich themselves over our children and future. Pathetic….and shame on the politicians for enabling them and accepting the bribes.

    Comment by marincountyman — 6.21.2012 @ 9:26 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment